tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1841819670822716434.post1158723065562508656..comments2023-11-29T16:57:15.811-08:00Comments on PSYOP Regimental Blog: The PSYOP Brand – A Commercial PerspectiveLawrence Dietzhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04048092221343162724noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1841819670822716434.post-38210604342533209372010-07-01T17:00:49.036-07:002010-07-01T17:00:49.036-07:00For one thing we should not have the same patch as...For one thing we should not have the same patch as CA. Second, I love the term you use; we should be rebranded as IO (Influence Operations). That is extremely easy to understand and very accurate. <br /><br />PSYOP SGTAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1841819670822716434.post-91935583214137242992010-07-01T09:32:13.990-07:002010-07-01T09:32:13.990-07:00Your points are exactly the risks MAJ Lopacienski ...Your points are exactly the risks MAJ Lopacienski highlights in his Small Wars Journal Blog post. "Re-branding" is a huge endeavor and should not be taken lightly. I seriously hope the Senior Leadership of DoD has a roadmap of where they want this go. There is great opportunity here if planned and executed effectively (key being planned and executed effectively). This is once again one of those times we will snatch defeat from the jaws of victory if we do not act swiftly and uniformly as a Regiment; your last paragraph is spot on.Bradnoreply@blogger.com