I’ve posted about cyber influence before. When an event
happens that confirms or reinforces some of what I’ve concluded I like to post
that reference as well. Anti-virus vendor Sophos publishes an almost daily
blurb called “Naked Security”. The November 20, 2104 editions featured an
article “Hackers Blamed For Unusual Tweets..” (see: https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2014/11/20/hackers-blamed-for-unusual-tweets-from-jeremy-clarkson-columbian-farc-rebels/
which is also the photo source.)
The substance of the article is: “TV presenter Jeremy
Clarkson and Colombian militia group FARC may not have much in common, but this
week they were linked by headlines blaming hackers for potentially embarrassing
Twitter messages.”
The article addresses how hackers can take over a Twitter
account and broadcast their own content to the detriment of the target. In some
cases the hacker will identify themselves either directly or indirectly by
virtue of the message, in others the hacker is content with remaining
unidentified.
These attacks can be broadly staged such as against governments
or large companies, or they can be tightly focused on particular individuals.
Depending on the nature of the target, more harm may come
from the publicizing of the attack rather than those who follow the target’s
tweets. The Twitterverse (if there is such a word) is a community of followers
and perhaps some analysts, but IMHO is not indicative of the general public.
In some locations Twitter users are likely to be younger,
perhaps more affluent and perhaps more educated. Also I suspect there is a higher
density of media types involved as well.
Reader comments appreciated.
No comments:
Post a Comment