On December 5, 2014 the Washington Post published an
article: “New US Military Command Established for Iraq and Syria Operations”
(see
“http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2014/12/05/new-u-s-military-command-established-for-iraq-and-syria-operations/).
The article indicated that LTG James L Terry was designated
CDR of Combined Joint Task Force (CJTF) – Operation Inherent
Resolve in addition to his current duties as CDR of the Army Component of
CENTCOM (ARCENT).
General’s Photo Source: http://www.isaf.nato.int/about-isaf/leadership/lieutenant-general-james-l.-terry.html
According to the article LTG Terry was
supposed to provide a briefing on the changes engendered by the new Command on
Friday the 5th. A check of the Pentagon issued a Press Advisory that
noted that the briefing had been postponed until December 18, 2014 at 10 AM
EST. (See: http://www.defense.gov/Advisories/Advisory.aspx?AdvisoryID=3691)
Given the challenge facing him, LTG
Terry is wise to gather his thoughts and resources first, figure out what
impression he wants to make on the world stage, then enter it.
The NY Times published the map a right to show ISIS
controlled areas in November 2014. It’s no coincidence that ISIS’ AO is Syria
and Iraq. It’s also no secret that ISIS is a new kind of enemy, one that is borderless,
and in many ways amorphous. (See:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/06/12/world/middleeast/the-iraq-isis-conflict-in-maps-photos-and-video.html?_r=0)
Appointing a single CDR to deal with this threat is in
keeping with the principle of Unity of Command and makes a great deal of sense
on many levels. The rank of the CDR indicates a Corps Level Command which
Normally implies a pretty big HQ element.
In this I would argue that smaller would be better.
Operations against ISIS need to be characterized by swiftness and flexibility.
The enemy has interwoven itself into the civilian population and can ebb and
flow within the population, as it needs to in order to defeat allied efforts
against them.
Non-kinetic efforts are absolutely critical in this
battle. They need to be a key element of
all operations conducted in the AO. Consideration needs to be given to the
implications (in the minds of the civilian population) of all acts conducted in
the AO.
The PSYOP support must be equally supple. The range of MISO
resources needed to support this new type of CJTF is mind-boggling. On one hand
tactical elements are needed as is normally the case and on the other,
strategic resources need to be on call to deal with events that have global
significance such as murder of hostages, massacres and the like.
GO HQ are often lumbering beasts often encumbered with big
staffs and meetings upon meetings. This one needs to be different.
Reader feedback encouraged.
2 comments:
Greetings.
That new US HQ could do well to request, integrate and include PSYOP-qualified SMEs from the armed forces of Jordan and Saudi Arabia, plus some Syrian and Iraqi Kurdish 'peshmergheh' fighters who have received and countered propaganda efforts by Daesh (aka ISIS / IS / ISIL et al in non-Arab media).
Both the Jordanian and Saudi Arabian land forces have a number of graduates (now somewhat senior in rank, but still skilled in PSYOP) from the earlier POOC conducted by USAJFKSWCS. They are especially intuitive and insightful about counter-propaganda (or "inoculation," as they call it) against external propaganda/PSYOP (i.e. emanating from Iraq during ODS and from Daesh now
Hope this helps. Today is Sunday, 28 Dec 2014.
Regards,
Stephen H. Franke
LTC, FAO (48G Middle East/"Gulfie), MI/SOF (SMU & PSYOP - 4POG[Abn])/
Attache/Security Cooperation
US Army Retired
San Pedro, California
Thanks for the great feedback! Let's see what some of the more 'current' folks have to say.
Post a Comment